Legal Opinion
Patricia Haro v. Kathleen Sebelius
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Decided September 4, 2013No. 11-16606PublishedCited by 5 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
CHRISTEN, Circuit Judge:
Secretary of Health and Human Services Kathleen Sebelius appeals the district court’s order certifying a nationwide class of Medicare beneficiaries and granting summary judgment in the beneficiaries’ favor. Patricia Haro, Jack McNutt, and Troy Hall are named plaintiffs. John Balentine was Haro’s lawyer in her underlying personal injury suit.
Before the district court, the beneficiaries raised two claims: (1) the Secretary’s practice of demanding “up front” reimbursement for secondary payments from beneficiaries who have appealed a reimbursement determination or…
2Cases cited33 opinions
- Lujan v. Defenders of WildlifeSupreme Court of the United States · 1992
- Chevron U. S. A. Inc. v. Natural Resources Defense Council, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1984
- Mathews v. EldridgeSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
- Friends of the Earth, Inc. v. Laidlaw Environmental Services (TOC), Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 2000
- City of Los Angeles v. LyonsSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
28 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- Haro v. SebeliusCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2013
- We Are America v. Maricopa County Board of SupervisorsDistrict Court, D. Arizona · 2013
- Blossom South, LLC v. SebeliusDistrict Court, W.D. New York · 2013
- Grandesign Advertising Firm, Inc. v. Talon US (Grrandesign) LLCDistrict Court, S.D. California · 2021
- Patricia Haro v. Kathleen SebeliusCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2014