Legal Opinion

In re the Estate of Maura

New York Surrogate's Court

Decided June 28, 2007PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION OF THE COURT

John B. Riordan, J.

In this proceeding to determine the validity of a right of election, respondent Margaret Maura has moved for contempt against the petitioners, John Maura, Jr. and Ronald Maura, nonparty witness, Warren Finnell, Esq., and the law firm of Congdon, Flaherty, O’Callaghan, Reid, Donlon, Travis & Fish-linger (hereinafter the Congdon law firm), to which Mr. Finnell is of counsel. The Congdon law firm has cross-moved for an order quashing the subpoena served by the respondent and for a protective order.

Procedural Background

Respondent and the decedent, John B.…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Allen v. Crowell-Collier Publishing Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1968
  2. Andon v. 302-304 Mott Street AssociatesNew York Court of Appeals · 2000
  3. Fell v. Presbyterian HospitalAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1983
  4. Etzion v. EtzionNew York Supreme Court · 2005
  5. Byrne v. ByrneNew York Supreme Court · 1996

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. In Re Honza, Texas Court of Appeals, 10th District (Waco)2008
  2. T.A. Ahern Contractors Corp. v. Dormitory AuthorityNew York Supreme Court · 2009
  3. MBIA Insurace v. Countrywide Home Loans, Inc.New York Supreme Court · 2010
  4. In re the Judicial Settlement of the Account of TamerNew York Surrogate's Court · 2009
  5. Schreiber v. SchreiberNew York Supreme Court · 2010

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API