In re Frankel
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
1Opinion of the Court
The Committee on Professional Standards moves to confirm the report of the Referee sustaining five charges of professional misconduct against *469respondent, an attorney admitted to practice before this court in 1959 and who maintains an office for the practice of law in the City of Schenectady.
The charges arise out of respondent’s alleged neglect of three client matters, misleading a client as to the status of two matters, and his failure, on several occasions, to maintain an adequate balance in his attorney’s escrow account. Although respondent appeared at the hearing before the Referee, he has…
2Cited by4 opinions
- In re BarnesAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1993
- In re BrennerAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1990
- In re LoughlinAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1986
- In re StraussAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1996