Legal Opinion

Granner v. Byam

Supreme Court of Iowa

Decided June 23, 1934No. 42464Published

1Opinion of the CourtAnderson, J.

This was an action at law upon a promissory note claimed to have been executed by D. E. Byam, Sr., and W. G. Hornung. The issues were between plaintiffs-appellees, Granner, and the defendant-appellant, Hornung. The defendant Hornung’s answer, in substance, denied that the note in suit was signed by the said defendant, and, further, that if the signature of the defendant appearing thereon is in the genuine handwriting of the defendant, that it was procured by some trickery and deceit and without the knowledge on the part of the defendant that he was signing a note; that if the signature to the…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. Spaulding v. Chicago, St. Paul & Kansas City Railway Co.Supreme Court of Iowa · 1896
  2. Courtright v. DeedsSupreme Court of Iowa · 1873
  3. Veith v. CassidySupreme Court of Iowa · 1926
  4. Wilkinson v. Queal Lumber Co.Supreme Court of Iowa · 1927
  5. Azeltine v. LuttermanSupreme Court of Iowa · 1934

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API