Legal Opinion

Michigan National Bank-Michiana v. Baumgart

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Decided December 4, 1981No. 81-1347PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

RYDER, Judge.

Appellant claims the trial court erred in denying its motion to dismiss pursuant to the venue provision under 12 U.S.C. § 94 (1970). We agree and reverse.

While residents of Michigan, appellees obtained an automobile loan from appellant, which was located in the state of Michigan, pledging the automobile as security for the loan. As a result of continuing repayment deficiencies, appellant attempted to make contact with appellees only to be informed that appellees had moved to Florida. Following numerous attempts to contact appel-lees concerning the arrearage on their account,…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Northside Iron and Metal Company, Inc. v. Dobson and Johnson, Inc., and the Third National BankCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1973
  2. Landmark Bank of West Broward, NA v. GirouxSupreme Court of Florida · 1978

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Flushing National Bank v. F. Ronald Mastriana, P.A.District Court of Appeal of Florida · 1982

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API