Legal Opinion
Jimmie W. Sullivan v. J. C. Taylor, Warden, United States Penitentiary, Leavenworth, Kansas,appellee
Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit
Decided December 8, 1964No. 7800_1PublishedCited by 2 opinions
1Per curiam
In this habeas corpus proceedings, the petitioner attacks his judgment of sentence contending that a motion under 28 U.S.C. § 2255 is “inadequate or ineffective to test the legality of his detention.” The same issues presented here were before the trial Court in a former 2255 proceedings, affirmed in this Court in Sullivan v. United States, 10 Cir., 315 F.2d 304. The remedy under Sec. 2255 is not inadequate or ineffective even though unsuccessful.
Affirmed.
2Cases cited1 opinion
- Jimmie Wayne Sullivan v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1963
3Cited by2 opinions
- Frederick Marion Fox v. J. C. Taylor, Warden, United States Penitentiary, Leavenworth, KansasCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1965
- John Leonard Mize v. Sherman H. Crouse, Warden, Kansas State Penitentiary, Lansing, KansasCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1964