Legal Opinion

United States v. Christie Buzard, Juan Antonio Tercero, Albert Dupuy

Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit

Decided September 1, 1989No. 88-1417, 88-1427 and 88-1429PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

ORDER DISMISSING APPEAL

By an order filed July 26, 1988 and docketed on July 28, 1988, the district court denied Dupuy’s timely motion for a new trial. Notice of appeal was required to be filed within ten days after the order was docketed. An exception is provided, however: “[ujpon a showing of excusable neglect the district court may, before or after the time has expired, with or without motion and notice, extend the time for filing a notice of appeal for a period not to exceed 30 days from the expiration of the time otherwise prescribed_” Fed.R.App.P. 4(b).

In this case the clerk apparently…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. United States v. John SchuchardtCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1982
  2. United States v. Howard Eugene AwaltCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1984

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. United States v. RapoportCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1998
  2. United States v. Steven Douglas GreenCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1996
  3. United States v. Daniel D. ClarkCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1993
  4. Edward Allen White v. Wayne McGinnisCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1990
  5. Edward Allen White v. Wayne McGinnisCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1990

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API