Legal Opinion

Gainesville National Bank v. Martin

Supreme Court of Georgia

Decided February 16, 1939No. 12646PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Grice, Justice.

Do the plaintiffs in error have a right of recovery under fire-insurance policies taken out by persons who are mortgagee beneficiaries under a trust deed, for the sole protection of said mortgagee beneficiaries, where a fire loss has occurred thereunder, all the insurance premiums having been paid by said mortgagee beneficiaries, and where a pro-tanto assignment and subrogation agreement is made between said mortgagee beneficiaries and the insurers, upon payment by the insurers to said mortgagee beneficiaries of the fire loss sustained by them and by virtue of said *563insurance…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Hackett v. CashSupreme Court of Alabama · 1916
  2. Peoples Bank v. Insurance Co. of North AmericaSupreme Court of Georgia · 1917
  3. Honore v. Lamar Fire InsuranceIllinois Supreme Court · 1869
  4. Stuyvesant Insurance v. ReidSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1916
  5. Scottish Union & National Insurance v. ColvardSupreme Court of Georgia · 1910

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Fortson v. Cotton States Mutual InsuranceCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1983
  2. Le Doux v. DettmeringAppellate Court of Illinois · 1942
  3. Suttles v. J. B. Withers Cigar Co.Supreme Court of Georgia · 1942
  4. Cohen v. McCandlessSupreme Court of Georgia · 1947
  5. Unity Life Insurance Company v. HulseySupreme Court of Georgia · 1943

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API