Legal Opinion

Shackleford v. Miller

Court of Appeals of Kentucky

Decided December 7, 1839PublishedCited by 5 opinions

Writ of Right. From the Circuit Court for Madison County.

1Opinion of the Court

The Chief Justice

delivered the Opinion of the Court.

This is a writ of right, in which Rachel Shackleford, the demandant, having failed in the Circuit Court, now insists here, that the Circuit Judge erred in admitting, as evidence against her on the trial of the mise, a conveyance to James Barnet, executed in 1811, by Bennet C. Shackleford, her husband, since dead, and certified as having been acknowledged, also, by herself, upon privy examination, for the tract of land claimed in her count; the inchoate title to which had been devised to her by her father, Samuel Bell, who died in 1783, and…

2Cited by5 opinions

  1. Pen-Ken Gas & Oil Corp. v. Warfield Natural Gas Co.Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1943
  2. Benningfield v. Reed & SutherlandCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1847
  3. Dorsey v. KendallCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1871
  4. Slade v. EcklerCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1869
  5. Pen-Ken Gas & Oil Corp. v. Warfield Natural Gas Co.Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1943

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API