Legal Opinion

Gee v. Brown

California Supreme Court

Decided May 5, 1975No. Sac. 7994PublishedCited by 23 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion

WRIGHT, C. J.

Joseph Gee, an inmate of the state prison, seeks to compel the Adult Authority (Authority) and the Department of Corrections to afford to him those rights prescribed for parole revocation and rescission hearings in Morrissey v. Brewer (1972) 408 U.S. 471 [33 L.Ed.2d 484, 92 S.Ct. 2593] and In re Prewitt (1972) 8 Cal.3d 470 [105 Cal.Rptr. 318, 503 P.2d 1326], particularly including a conditional right to be represented by counsel at rescission hearings as has been afforded at revocation hearings in Gagnon v. Scarpelli (1973) 411 U.S. 778 [36 L.Ed.2d 656, 93 S.Ct. 1756] and…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Wolff v. McDonnellSupreme Court of the United States · 1974
  2. Morrissey v. BrewerSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
  3. Gagnon v. ScarpelliSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
  4. Brown v. AllenSupreme Court of the United States · 1953
  5. In Re PrewittCalifornia Supreme Court · 1972

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by23 opinions

  1. People v. HannonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1977
  2. In Re Roger S.California Supreme Court · 1977
  3. In Re FainCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1983
  4. People v. Todd W.California Court of Appeal · 1979
  5. In Re FainCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1983

18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API