In re Andre B.
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
1Opinion of the Court
The findings of neglect and derivative neglect are supported *412by a preponderance of the evidence showing that respondent posed an imminent danger of harm to Giovanni (see Nicholson v Scoppetta, 3 NY3d 357, 368 [2004]; Matter of Joshua R., 47 AD3d 465 [2008], lv denied 11 NY3d 703 [2008]). A hospital clerk testified that she saw respondent forcefully shake the two-week-old Giovanni like a rag doll, that respondent told her he had been feeding the infant bananas, and that respondent called the baby the devil. Giovanni’s mother also testified that respondent fed the infant bananas and referred to…
2Cases cited2 opinions
- Nicholson v. ScoppettaNew York Court of Appeals · 2004
- In re Pedro C.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2003
3Cited by3 opinions
- Matter of Keith H. (Logann Marchele K.)Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2016
- In re Keith H.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2014
- In re Keith H.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2014