Legal Opinion · Dissent

Fendrich v. Lauck

South Dakota Supreme Court

Decided July 1, 1981No. 13184Published

1DissentHenderson, Justice

I would hold that the trial court’s entry of summary judgment was correct with regard to both the malicious prosecution and libel causes of action.

Upon a motion timely made, summary judgment will be granted to the movant if there exists no genuine issue of material fact. SDCL 15-6-56(c); Wilson v. Great Northern Railway Company, 83 S.D. 207, 157 N.W.2d 19 (1968). I cannot dispute that the letter in question is libelous per se. SDCL 20-11-3. Nor do I contest the assertion that the letter constituted a privileged communication. SDCL 20-11-5(3); see also Vogel v. Gruaz, 110 U.S. 311, 4 S.Ct. 12,…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Wilson v. Great Northern Railway CompanySouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1968
  2. Vogel v. GruazSupreme Court of the United States · 1884
  3. Zarate v. CortinasCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1977
  4. Uken v. SloatSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1980
  5. Shinglemeyer v. Wright.Michigan Supreme Court · 1900

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API