Legal Opinion
Halliburton Co. v. United States
District Court, N.D. Texas
Decided April 23, 1985No. Civ. A. 4-82-191-E, 4-82-300-EPublishedCited by 6 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM OPINION
MAHON, District Judge.
Plaintiffs Halliburton Company and Otis Engineering Corporation brought separate refund suits in this Court for manufacturer’s excise taxes and interest alleged to be illegally and erroneously assessed by the defendant and paid by Plaintiff Halliburton in the amount of $143,261.85 1 and by Plain tiff Otis in the amount of $6,604.00 2 on certain trucks and trailers used by them. This Court has jurisdiction over the subject matter of this action pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1346(a)(1) and venue is proper in the Northern District of Texas. The cases have been…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Motor Vehicle Mfrs. Assn. of United States, Inc. v. State Farm Mut. Automobile Ins. Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1983
- United States v. Vogel Fertilizer Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1982
- International Business MacHines Corporation v. The United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1965
- Daube v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1933
- Western Company of North America, J & L Tank, Inc., Grayco Electrical, Inc. And Aggregate Plant Products Company v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1983
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- Gateway Equipment Corp. v. United StatesDistrict Court, W.D. New York · 2003
- Schlumberger Technology Corp. & Subsidiaries v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2003
- Worldwide Equipment, Inc. v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2010
- Utilicorp United, Inc. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1990
- Worldwide Equipment v. United StatesDistrict Court, E.D. Kentucky · 2008
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.