Legal Opinion

Stuart v. St. Regis Paper Co.

District Court, D. Massachusetts

Decided January 28, 1952No. Civ. No. 51-1234PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

WYZANSKI, District Judge.

The precise issue raised by this case is what constitutes an “initial pleading” within the meaning of the remo'val statute, 28 U.S.C. § 1446(b). October 23, 1951 plaintiff sued out a writ against defendant “in an action of contract — for commission due for services”. Consistently with Mass. General Laws (Ter.Ed.) c. 231, § 12, a copy of the declaration was neither supplied with nor inserted in the writ. Cf. Ferguson and Company, Inc., v. Melillo, 266 Mass. 197, 198, 165 N.E. 18; Auer v. Costa, D.C. Mass., 23 F.Supp. 22. The writ was served on the defendant October 29,…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Auer v. CostaDistrict Court, D. Massachusetts · 1938
  2. Ferguson & Co. v. MelilloMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1929

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. H. B. Ardison and Johnnie Wilson v. Usbaldo O. VillaCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1957
  2. Milton A. Jacobs, Inc. v. Manning Manufacturing Corp.District Court, S.D. New York · 1959
  3. Cipriano v. Monarch Life InsuranceDistrict Court, D. Rhode Island · 1956

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API