Legal Opinion

Curtis v. State ex rel. Morgan

Ohio Supreme Court

Decided June 19, 1923No. 17807Published

1Opinion of the CourtMarshall, C. J.

This proceeding in error involves the interpretation of the civil service statutes of Ohio, more particularly Sections 486-17, 486-17a, 486-19, of the General Code, and Section 4 of rule 7 of the civil service regulations of the city of Canton. It is necessary to determine from those sections and other Ohio statutes the powers and duties of the safety director and Civil Service Commission of the city, and their relations toward each other. The difficulty in interpreting these statutes lies not so much in ambiguity of any of their provisions as in the fact of apparent conflict between these…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. People Ex Rel. Corrigan v. . the Mayor, Etc.New York Court of Appeals · 1896
  2. Fitzsimmons v. O'NeillIllinois Supreme Court · 1905
  3. Gardner v. City of LowellMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1915
  4. Lethbridge v. . Mayor, Etc., of New YorkNew York Court of Appeals · 1892
  5. Venable v. Police CommissionersOregon Supreme Court · 1902

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API