Legal Opinion

Mier v. Commonwealth

Court of Appeals of Virginia

Decided July 1, 1991No. Record No. 0476-90-4PublishedCited by 19 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion

WILLIS, J.

The appellant, Harriot Mier, was indicted for the intentional concealment and conversion of merchandise, valued in excess of $200, without having paid the purchase price, in violation of Code § 18.2-103. She moved to suppress as evidence inculpatory statements made by her to private security agents who had not advised her of her rights pursuant to Miranda v. Arizona, 384 U.S. 436 (1966). This motion was denied and she was convicted of petit larceny. On appeal, she contends that the trial court erred in denying her motion to suppress the inculpatory statements. We find no…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. Miranda v. ArizonaSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
  2. Estelle v. SmithSupreme Court of the United States · 1981
  3. Martin v. CommonwealthCourt of Appeals of Virginia · 1987
  4. Tarnef v. StateAlaska Supreme Court · 1973
  5. F.B.C. Stores, Inc. v. DuncanSupreme Court of Virginia · 1973

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by19 opinions

  1. Quinn v. CommonwealthCourt of Appeals of Virginia · 1997
  2. Campbell v. CommonwealthCourt of Appeals of Virginia · 2002
  3. Barkley v. CommonwealthCourt of Appeals of Virginia · 2003
  4. Sabo v. CommonwealthCourt of Appeals of Virginia · 2002
  5. United States v. DayCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 2010

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API