Legal Opinion

Hildreth v. Mercantile Trust Co.

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided April 15, 1906Published

Appeals by the defendants, the Mercantile Trust Company and Others, from an order -'of the Supreme Court, enteredin the office of the clerk of Suffolk county on-the 33d day of January, 1906. •

1Opinion of the Court

Jenks, J.:

We are of opinion that the demurrer is not so plainly had as to require no .argument to show it. so, and that hare- inspection of "the pleading indicates that it was made in bad faith. Therefore, it cannot he disposed of as frivolous. (Oooh v. Warren, 88 N. Y. 87; Strong v. Bproul, 53. id. 497; Shaw v. Pelt-man, 99 App. Div. 514) The le&rned-counsel for the respondent contends that xve should .go-beyond the -question of frivolousness to the merits, hut under our decision in'Shaw v. Pelt-man {supra) we think- that we should not do so, The order should he reversed, with ten dollars…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Shaw v. FeltmanAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1904

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API