Legal Opinion · Dissent

State v. Severe

Supreme Court of Missouri

Decided January 12, 2010No. SC 89948Published

1DissentPatricia Breckenridge, Judge

I respectfully dissent. Today, the Court mandates that prosecutors second guess the holdings of appellate courts and submit evidence in anticipation of a post-trial change in the standard of proof. In so ruling, the Court adopts a special rule applicable only to the DWI prior and persistent offender statutes that is contrary to this Court’s precedent and unfairly impedes the state’s efforts to keep repeat drunk drivers off Missouri’s roads. In contrast, on the finding that Vanessa Severe’s claim of error is meritorious, I would follow precedent and remand the case to the trial court for…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. Burks v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1978
  2. Lockhart v. NelsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1988
  3. Bifulco v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1980
  4. State v. WoodSupreme Court of Missouri · 1980
  5. State v. CobbSupreme Court of Missouri · 1994

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API