Legal Opinion

Blackman v. Eggerton

Louisiana Court of Appeal

Decided November 13, 1996No. Nos. 96-CA-1624, 96-CA-1625PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

PLOTKIN, Judge.

12Plaintiffs, Stanley Blackman Sr., Tara Jackson, and Stanley Blackman Jr., appeal a trial court judgment granting a motion for summary judgment in favor of defendant, State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Co. In granting the motion for summary judgment, the trial court found that deposition evidence presented by the plaintiffs was not competent and thus was insufficient to overcome State Farm’s evidence that the driver of a hit-and-run vehicle which caused injury to the plaintiffs when it struck the plaintiffs’ vehicle was not a permissive user and thus was not covered under…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. Parks v. HallSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1938
  2. Aisole v. DeanSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1991
  3. Walker v. KroopLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1996
  4. Short v. GiffinLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1996
  5. Francois v. YbarzabalSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1986

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Yokum v. Funky 544 Rhythm & Blues CafeLouisiana Court of Appeal · 2018
  2. Tournillon v. Sewerage and Water Bd.Louisiana Court of Appeal · 1997
  3. Neider v. FontanaLouisiana Court of Appeal · 2005

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API