Legal Opinion

R. L. Kimsey Cotton Co. v. Pacific Insurance Co. of New York

Supreme Court of Georgia

Decided April 8, 1968No. 24419PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Per curiam

In this case we review a ruling of the Court of Appeals that an insured, as a matter of law, did not exercise due diligence in maintaining fire prevention equipment in complete working order thereby increasing the hazard of fire and suspending the fire insurance coverage. More specifically it was held: “Where a contract of fire insurance expressly required the insured to exercise due diligence in maintaining all fire prevention equipment in complete working order, and provided that the insurance was suspended and the insurer was not liable for loss occurring while the hazard was increased by…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Pacific Insurance v. R. L. Kimsey Cotton Co.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 1967

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Commercial Union Insurance v. TaylorCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1983
  2. Board of Education v. St. Paul Fire & Marine InsuranceDistrict Court, D. Maryland · 1975
  3. Pacific Insurance v. R. L. Kimsey Cotton Co.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 1968
  4. R. L. Kimsey Cotton Co. v. Pacific Insurance Co. of New YorkSupreme Court of Georgia · 1968
  5. Royal Frozen Foods Co. v. GarrettCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1969

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API