Legal Opinion

Magee v. Rite Aid

Court of Appeals of Washington

Decided January 17, 2012No. 65861-1-IPublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtSchindler, J.

¶1 Marcia R. Magee appeals from a 2010 decision and order of the Board of Industrial Insurance Appeals (Board) and the order denying her motion to vacate. The Board ruled that even if it erroneously exceeded the scope of review in previously deciding that Magee’s claim did not constitute an occupational disease, because Magee did not challenge that determination in her appeal of the 2006 “Decision and Order,” that decision was valid and binding. We affirm the Board’s decision and order and the order denying Magee’s motion to vacate the conclusion in the Board’s 2006 Decision and Order that…

2Cases cited19 opinions

  1. Dennis v. Department of Labor & IndustriesWashington Supreme Court · 1987
  2. Marley v. Department of Labor & IndustriesWashington Supreme Court · 1994
  3. Streater v. WhiteCourt of Appeals of Washington · 1980
  4. Barnett v. HicksWashington Supreme Court · 1992
  5. Dougherty v. DEPT. OF LABOR & INDUSTRIESWashington Supreme Court · 2003

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Michael Weaver v. City Of EverettCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2018
  2. Teresa Banowsky v. Guy Backstrom, D.c., D/b/a...Court of Appeals of Washington · 2018
  3. Magee v. Rite AidCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2012
  4. Scott Blomenkamp v. City Of EdmondsCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2019

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API