Legal Opinion
MacE v. Domash
District Court, District of Columbia
Decided May 8, 2008No. Civil Action 05-02244(HHK)PublishedCited by 6 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER
HENRY H. KENNEDY, JR., District Judge.
Invoking this court’s diversity jurisdiction, Peter Mace brings this action against Larry Domash alleging fraud and unjust enrichment arising out of Domash’s alleged breach of an oral contract. Before the court is Domash’s motion to dismiss for lack of subject matter jurisdiction pursuant to Fed.R.Civ.P. 12(b)(1) [# 36]. Upon consideration of the motion, the opposition thereto, and the record of the ease, the court concludes that Domash’s motion must be denied.
I. FACTUAL BACKGROUND
Mace asserts that he and Domash entered into an…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- Saint Paul Mercury Indemnity Co. v. Red Cab Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1938
- Manual De J. Gomez v. Jerry v. Wilson, Chief of PoliceCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1973
- Jake King v. Honorable Rogers C. B. Morton, Secretary of the Interior of the United StatesCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1975
- Brown v. WebsterSupreme Court of the United States · 1895
- Transaero, Inc. v. La Fuerza Area Boliviana, an Instrumentality of the Republic of Bolivia, a Foreign StateCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1994
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- McIntosh v. GilleyDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2010
- Saiyed v. Council on American-Islamic Relations Action Network, Inc.District Court, District of Columbia · 2015
- McDermott v. BB & T BANKCARD CORP.Court of Special Appeals of Maryland · 2009
- Modis, Inc. v. Infotran Systems, Inc.District Court, District of Columbia · 2009
- McIntosh v. GilleyDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2010
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.