Legal Opinion

Wymelenberg v. Badger Furnace Co.

Wisconsin Supreme Court

Decided March 3, 1936PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the CourtMartin, J.

Among other findings made by the trial court were the following:

“That an agreement existed between J. PI. Van Vreede [debtor] and Badger Furnace Company [appellant] at the time of the execution of the mortgáge on February 27, 1933, that the mortgagor would remain in possession of the property covered by the mortgage and sell it in the ordinary course of trade and retail dealing, as he had before the execution of the mortgage.
“That goods were sold by the mortgagor in the ordinary retail trade and the proceeds were not applied toward the payment of the mortgage debt.
“That the mortgagee at all…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Blakeslee v. RossmanWisconsin Supreme Court · 1877
  2. Durr v. WildishWisconsin Supreme Court · 1900
  3. Ross v. State BankWisconsin Supreme Court · 1929
  4. Fisk v. HarshawWisconsin Supreme Court · 1878

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Home Savings Bank v. MoskowitzWisconsin Supreme Court · 1963

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API