Legal Opinion

In re Heat 'N' Eat Brands, Inc.

District Court, W.D. Kentucky

Decided July 9, 1959No. Bankr. No. 19197PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

BROOKS, District Judge.

This case is submitted to review an order of the Referee allowing Hope Machinery Company, Incorporated, a preferred claim based on a mechanic’s and materialmen’s lien filed pursuant to KRS 376.010.

The bankrupt, Heat ’N’ Eat Brands, Inc., engaged in the business of processing and manufacturing meat products, purchased an automatic filling and conveying machine from the claimant for nse in its business, and this machine was assembled and installed by the claimant in a building leased to the bankrupt. 'The machine had electricity, water and .steam connections and was…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Piedmont & Georges Creek Coal Co. v. Seaboard Fisheries Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1920
  2. Wiggins Ferry Co. v. Ohio & Mississippi Railway Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1892
  3. Egyptian Supply Co. v. BoydCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1941
  4. Steele & Lebby v. Flynn-Sullivan Co.Court of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1932
  5. Bank of Shelbyville v. HartfordCourt of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1937

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Guarantee Electric Co. v. Big Rivers Electric Corp.District Court, W.D. Kentucky · 1987
  2. SANDUSKY FOUNDRY & MACHINE CO. v. City of WickliffeDistrict Court, W.D. Kentucky · 1972
  3. Smith v. ScogganCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1960
  4. Brumley-Saylor, Inc. v. Royal International Corp. (In re Royal International Corp.)District Court, W.D. Kentucky · 1981
  5. Heat Eat Brands, Inc. v. ScogganCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1960

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API