Legal Opinion

Warbett v. Polokoff

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided June 18, 1964PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Order, entered March 4, 1964, denying motion by plaintiffs to open their default in service of a reply and to vacate inquest taken upon defendant’s counterclaim, reversed, on the law, on the facts, and in the exercise of discretion, without costs, and motion granted. The action was brought to recover for personal injuries sustained in an automobile accident and the counterclaim seeks to recover damages to defendant’s vehicle. The plaintiffs make a prima facie showing of a meritorious defense to the counterclaim and that the default was inadvertent due to a misunderstanding between plaintiffs’…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Allen v. FinkAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1925
  2. Baldwin v. Yellow Taxi Corp.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1927
  3. Long Island Trading Corp. v. TuthillAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1935
  4. Allen v. FinkAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1925

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. N & J Foods, Inc. v. Shopwell Plaza Corp.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1978
  2. Du-Art Film Laboratories, Inc. v. Wharton International Films Inc.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1982
  3. New York Produce Trade Ass'n v. MazzilliAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1975

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API