Legal Opinion

Murphy v. Helena Rubenstein Co.

Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit

Decided December 8, 1965No. Nos. 15184, 15185PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Per curiam

On motion, the district court entered an order vacating a default judgment and at the same time refusing to quash, service. At this intermediate stage of the litigation the plaintiffs have appealed from the vacating of the default judgment and the defendants have taken a cross-appeal from the refusal to quash service.

We have recently held that an order vacating a default judgment is not final within the meaning of section 1291 of Title 28, United States Code, and, therefore, cannot support an immediate appeal. Crowe v. Ragnar Benson, Inc., 1962, 307 F.2d 73. Similarly, a refusal to quash…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. William A. Crowe, Trading as William A. Crowe Company v. Ragnar Benson, IncCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1962

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Joseph v. Office of the Consulate General of NigeriaCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1987
  2. Giarrusso v. CorriganSupreme Court of Rhode Island · 1971
  3. Joseph v. Office Of The Consulate General Of NigeriaCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1987
  4. Allen v. Cole Realty, Inc.Supreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1974
  5. Epting v. Precision Paint & Glass, Inc.Supreme Court of Arkansas · 2003

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API