Legal Opinion
In Re Stacey
Supreme Court of Vermont
Decided February 5, 1980No. 37-79PublishedCited by 24 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtLarrow, J.
This is an appeal by the State from a decision of the Vermont Labor Relations Board (hereinafter Board) which found that grievant, Adele Stacey, had been wrongfully terminated by her employing unit, the Vermont Comprehensive Employment and Training Office (hereinafter CETO). Questions for review were certified to this Court under V.R.A.P. 13(d), and a cross-appeal was taken by Adele Stacey as to the issue of back pay. The parties stipulated under V.R.A.P. 28(f) that the State would be considered the appellant in this case.
Adele Stacey had been employed as a clerk by CETO for about five years…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- In Re Grievance of BrooksSupreme Court of Vermont · 1977
- Lamoille Grain Co. v. St. Johnsbury & Lamoille County RailroadSupreme Court of Vermont · 1976
- Cross-Abbott Company v. Howard's, Inc.Supreme Court of Vermont · 1965
- Emerson v. HughesSupreme Court of Vermont · 1952
- In Re Grievance of GageSupreme Court of Vermont · 1979
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by24 opinions
- Isbrandtsen v. North Branch Corp.Supreme Court of Vermont · 1988
- In Re Grievance of MuzzySupreme Court of Vermont · 1982
- Sanders v. St. Paul Mercury InsuranceSupreme Court of Vermont · 1987
- Town of Calais v. County Road CommissionersSupreme Court of Vermont · 2002
- Rennie v. StateSupreme Court of Vermont · 2000
19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.