Legal Opinion

Bab Ass'n of Greater Cleveland v. Sandler

Ohio Supreme Court

Decided July 20, 1977No. D. D. No. 77-4PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Per curiam

The board found the presented evidence conclusively demonstrated that respondent knowingly took part, for a fee, in a scheme to defraud by an attempt to sell back to the true owner or insurer a truck known by him to be stolen property.

DR 1-102(A) admonishes, inter alia:

“A lawyer shall not:

tt # # #

“(4) Engage in conduct involving dishonesty, fraud, deceit, or misrepresentation.
*134“(5) Engage in conduct that is prejudicial to the administration of justice.
“(6) Engage in any other conduct that adversely reflects on his fitness to practice law. ’ ’

DR 7-102(A) cautions, inter alia:

“In his…

2Cited by3 opinions

  1. State Ex Rel. Oklahoma Bar Ass'n v. BoltonSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1995
  2. Bar Ass'n v. ZaffiroOhio Supreme Court · 1980
  3. State Ex Rel. Oklahoma Bar Ass'n v. BoltonSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1995

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API