Legal Opinion
Bab Ass'n of Greater Cleveland v. Sandler
Ohio Supreme Court
Decided July 20, 1977No. D. D. No. 77-4PublishedCited by 3 opinions
1Per curiam
The board found the presented evidence conclusively demonstrated that respondent knowingly took part, for a fee, in a scheme to defraud by an attempt to sell back to the true owner or insurer a truck known by him to be stolen property.
DR 1-102(A) admonishes, inter alia:
“A lawyer shall not:
tt # # #
“(4) Engage in conduct involving dishonesty, fraud, deceit, or misrepresentation.
*134“(5) Engage in conduct that is prejudicial to the administration of justice.
“(6) Engage in any other conduct that adversely reflects on his fitness to practice law. ’ ’
DR 7-102(A) cautions, inter alia:
“In his…
2Cited by3 opinions
- State Ex Rel. Oklahoma Bar Ass'n v. BoltonSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1995
- Bar Ass'n v. ZaffiroOhio Supreme Court · 1980
- State Ex Rel. Oklahoma Bar Ass'n v. BoltonSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1995