Chase v. Steel
California Supreme Court
Appeal from the District Court of the Fourteenth Judicial District. The facts necessary to understand the points decided, appear in the opinion of the Court.
1Opinion of the CourtTerry, C. J.
This was an action for a dissolution of a partnership and account.
From the record, it appears that plaintiff, under contract with the Empire Mill Company, furnished material and performed labor, in building a race and flume for their use, and that the company were indebted to him, on account of such labor and material, in the sum of $4,580; that the Empire Mill Company was composed of plaintiff, and defendants Steel, Gould, and Til-den, plaintiff and Steel owning each one-third interest, and defendants Gould and Tilden owning one-third; that the interest of Gould and Tilden had been purchased…
2Cited by7 opinions
- Power Grocery Co. v. HintonCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1920
- Ohio Casualty Insurance v. Harbor InsuranceCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1968
- Bullock v. HubbardCalifornia Supreme Court · 1863
- Whelan v. ShainCalifornia Supreme Court · 1896
- Drexel Furniture Co. v. Bank of DearingSupreme Court of Georgia · 1933
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.