Legal Opinion

Stagg v. Eureka Tanning & Currying Co.

Supreme Court of Missouri

Decided March 15, 1874PublishedCited by 5 opinions

id.ppe.al from Si. Louis Circuit Court.

1Opinion of the CourtVories, Judge

This action was brought by the plaintiff in the St. Louis Circuit Court against the defendant to recover the amount of $2,086.66, on an account for rent alleged to be due from the defendant to one John How, and which had on the 9th day of August, 1869, been-assigned and transferred in writing to the plaintiff. _ "

There is no questiqn made on the pleadings; the petition being in the usual form, setting out the premises leased. The defendant by its answer denies its indebtedness to plaintiff, and for further answer states, that on the 8th day of May, 1861, *318the said John How did, by his warranty…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Jackson ex dem. Russell v. RowlandNew York Supreme Court · 1831
  2. Pentz v. KuesterSupreme Court of Missouri · 1867
  3. McKittrick v. ClemensSupreme Court of Missouri · 1873
  4. Walker v. HarperSupreme Court of Missouri · 1863

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Pulliam v. BurlingameSupreme Court of Missouri · 1883
  2. Cherokee Strip Live Stock Ass'n v. Cass Land & Cattle Co.Supreme Court of Missouri · 1897
  3. Woodbury v. BunkerUtah Supreme Court · 1940
  4. Logan v. WoolwineMissouri Court of Appeals · 1894
  5. Chaffin v. BrockmeyerMissouri Court of Appeals · 1888

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API