James v. Schroeder
Michigan Supreme Court
Error to Manistee. (Judkins, J.). Debt on bond. Defendants bring error. The facts are stated in the opinion, and head-note 1.
1Opinion of the CourtCampbell, C. J.
Defendants were sued on a bond, dated June 1, 1883, whereby they bound themselves to pay, within ninety days after referees reporting, as follows:
“Whereas, the said Emilie Sehroeder and the said Hiram W. James have been engaged in litigation in regard to a certain pier built by said James upon the land claimed by said Sehroeder; and whereas, the said parties have agreed to leave the value of said pier out to Otto Bauman, sheriff of Manistee county, and two other persons to be selected by him, which sum so found, as to the value of said pier, the said Emilie Sehroeder has agreed to pay in…
2Cited by12 opinions
- Omaha Water Co. v. City of OmahaCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1908
- Toledo S. S. Co. v. Zenith Transp. Co.Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1911
- Vincent v. Germah InsuranceSupreme Court of Iowa · 1903
- Dworkin v. Caledonian InsuranceSupreme Court of Missouri · 1920
- American Steel Co. v. German-American Fire Ins.Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1911
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.