State v. Neff
Washington Supreme Court
1Opinion of the Court
*456¶1 After a stipulated facts trial, a judge found Roy Len Neff guilty of unlawfully manufacturing a controlled substance and added a firearm enhancement. The Court of Appeals affirmed the conviction. State v. Neff, noted at 133 Wn. App. 1042 (2006). We granted review of its decision. State v. Neff, 160 Wn.2d 1009 (2007). Neff argues that he did not waive his right to appeal, that his firearm enhancement was not supported by sufficient evidence, and that he received ineffective assistance of counsel. He is right on the first argument; he did not knowingly waive his right to appeal. But he is…
2Cases cited24 opinions
- Strickland v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
- Michel v. LouisianaSupreme Court of the United States · 1956
- Affronti v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1955
- State v. RupeWashington Supreme Court · 1984
- State v. MyersWashington Supreme Court · 1997
19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by15 opinions
- State v. ANJWashington Supreme Court · 2010
- State v. Sassen Van ElslooWashington Supreme Court · 2018
- State Of Washington v. Jonathan D. HarrisCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2018
- State v. RUEMCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2011
- State Of Washington v. Alejandro Anaya-cabreraCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2020
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.