Mizell v. Sylacauga Grocery Co.
Supreme Court of Alabama
1Opinion of the CourtThomas, J.
Tbe suit is on common counts against defendants as parties doing business under a firm name and style. Defendants pleaded the general issue and that denying the partnership existence.
The liability of partners for the contracts of the partnership and that imposed on one held out as a partner was the subject of extended discussion in Eggleston v. Wilson, 211 Ala. 140, 100 So. 89. These recognized rules need not now he repeated. It is declared that in actions by strangers against partners or for tbe liability imposed on a partner, that same strictness of proof is not required to establish the…
2Cases cited21 opinions
- McMillan v. AikenSupreme Court of Alabama · 1920
- Jones v. BellSupreme Court of Alabama · 1917
- Humes v. O'Bryan & WashingtonSupreme Court of Alabama · 1883
- Councill v. MayhewSupreme Court of Alabama · 1911
- Miller v. WhittingtonSupreme Court of Alabama · 1918
16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by1 opinion
- City of Birmingham v. JacksonSupreme Court of Alabama · 1934