Legal Opinion · Concurring in part, dissenting in part
Glen Coal Co. v. Seals
Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit
Decided June 24, 1998No. 96-4121Published
1Concurring in part, dissenting in partMoore, Circuit Judge
The Supreme Court very recently reiterated its well-established view that a reviewing court must accord substantial deference to an agency’s interpretation of its own regulations where the interpretation is neither irrational nor an impermissible construction of the enabling statute. See Allentown Mack Sales and Serv., Inc. v. NLRB, — U.S.-, 118 S.Ct. 818, 828, 139 L.Ed.2d 797 (1998) (National Labor Relations Board/National Labor Relations Act). In the instant appeal before this court, the Director, Office of Workers’ Compensation Programs, United States Department of Labor,1 (the “Director”…
2Cases cited19 opinions
- Chevron U. S. A. Inc. v. Natural Resources Defense Council, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1984
- Auer v. RobbinsSupreme Court of the United States · 1997
- Martin v. Occupational Safety & Health Review CommissionSupreme Court of the United States · 1991
- Wisconsin Public Intervenor v. MortierSupreme Court of the United States · 1991
- Allentown MacK Sales & Service, Inc. v. National Labor Relations BoardSupreme Court of the United States · 1998
14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.