Legal Opinion

United States v. Haymond

Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit

Decided August 31, 2017No. 16-5156PublishedCited by 21 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

BRISCOE, Circuit Judge.

The district court revoked Andre Ralph Haymond’s supervised release based in part on a finding that Haymond knowingly possessed thirteen images of child pornography. The district court imposed the mandatory minimum sentence required by 18 U.S.C. § 3583(k). Haymond appeals and argues that the evidence was insufficient to support a finding by a preponderance of the evidence that he possessed child pornography, and that 18 U.S.C. § 3583(k) is unconstitutional because it violates his right to due process.

We conclude that the evidence was sufficient to support the district…

2Cases cited24 opinions

  1. Apprendi v. New JerseySupreme Court of the United States · 2000
  2. United States v. BookerSupreme Court of the United States · 2004
  3. Morrissey v. BrewerSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
  4. In Re WINSHIPSupreme Court of the United States · 1970
  5. Alleyne v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 2013

19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by21 opinions

  1. United States v. HaymondSupreme Court of the United States · 2019
  2. United States v. Anthony WilsonCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2019
  3. United States v. MirabalCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2017
  4. United States v. PorterCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2018
  5. United States v. HaymondCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2019

16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API