Legal Opinion

Siegle v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Decided October 20, 1993No. 92-03223PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Per curiam

We affirm appellant’s convictions for sale and possession of a hallucinogenic substance. However, we find that the trial court erred in imposing adult sanctions without first making the findings required by section 39.059(7)(c), Florida Statutes (1991). This is so even though appellant’s sentence, two years’ Youthful Offender community control, was the result of a plea agreement. Sirmons v. State, 620 So.2d 1249 (Fla.1993); Thomas v. State, 623 So.2d 1238 (Fla. 2d DCA 1993). After remand the trial court may reimpose the adult sanction provided the statutory findings are made.

Reversed and…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Sirmons v. StateSupreme Court of Florida · 1993
  2. Thomas v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1993

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Sullivan v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1993

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API