Legal Opinion

Naylor v. Schenck

New York Court of Common Pleas

Decided May 15, 1854Published

Appeal by the defendants from a judgment of the Mariné Court. The material facts are stated in the opinion.

1Opinion of the CourtBy the Court. Woodruff, J.

The only question presented by this appeal is this: Where a defendant has commenced an action for damages for the breach of a contract made by the plaintiff, and thereafter the plaintiff brings a cross action upon the same contract against the defendant, may the defendant recoup his damages in the latter action', or does the pendency of the former suit prevent it ?

In this case the plaintiff brought his action in the Marine Court for rent due on a lease. The defendants, by way of defence, setup the non-performance of the covenants in the lease by the plaintiff, and claimed to recoup their…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Lightbody v. PotterNew York Supreme Court · 1833

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API