Legal Opinion

Snizaski v. Public School Employees' Retirement Board

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania

Decided May 28, 2013PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

Justice McCAFFERY.

The issue before this Court is as follows:

Whether the Commonwealth Court correctly interpreted 24 Pa.C.S. § 8507(e) to require in this case that a Public School Employees’ Retirement System nomination of benefits form must have been completed entirely in the hand of the member/decedent in order to effectuate a valid change of beneficiary designation.

Snizaski v. Public School Employees’ Retirement Board, 606 Pa. 87, 995 A.2d 334 (2010) (per curiam).

We conclude that the Commonwealth Court erred, and hold that the Public School Employees’ Retirement Board (the “Board”)…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Samuel-Bassett v. Kia Motors America, Inc.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2011
  2. Pennsylvania Medical Society v. Department of Public WelfareSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2012
  3. Kirsch v. Public School Employees' Retirement BoardSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2009
  4. Estate of Rosenstein ex rel. Rosenstein v. Public School Employees' Retirement SystemCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1996
  5. Snizaski v. Public School Employees' Retirement BoardSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2010

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Verizon Pennsylvania, Inc. v. CommonwealthCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 2013
  2. K. Snizaski and C. Vilsack v. Public School Employees' Retirement Bd.Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 2014

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API