Legal Opinion

Randle v. State

Court of Criminal Appeals of Alabama

Decided June 14, 1988No. 5 Div. 932PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

ON RETURN TO REMAND

McMILLAN, Judge.

This cause was remanded to the trial court for resentencing because records of two of the prior convictions, from Kentucky and Georgia, were not properly certified. See § 12-21-70, Code of Alabama (1975). During the re-sentencing hearing, the prosecutor conceded that one of the convictions could not be used for enhancement purposes because that felony conviction was made an element of the conviction of escape. See Ringer v. State, 501 So.2d 493, 494 (Ala.Cr.App.1986); Lee v. State, 512 So.2d 826, 828 (Ala.Cr.App.1987). That conviction was not one of the two…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Ex Parte WilliamsSupreme Court of Alabama · 1987
  2. Ex Parte GloverSupreme Court of Alabama · 1987
  3. Ringer v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Alabama · 1986
  4. Lee v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Alabama · 1987

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Ex Parte RandleSupreme Court of Alabama · 1989
  2. Clackler v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Alabama · 1991
  3. Randle v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Alabama · 1991

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API