Legal Opinion

In re Andrews

District Court, N.D. California

Decided November 14, 1930No. 18168-KPublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

KERRIGAN, District Judge.

The bankrupt has petitioned for his discharge. Vigo Lambreeht, a creditor, has filed *950specifications of objection to tbe discharge; the sole ground of objection being that the single debt scheduled and proved in the bankruptcy proceedings is not a. dischargeable debt under the second, clause of section 17 of the Bankruptcy Act (11 USCA § 35). The bankrupt has made various objections relative to the appearance of the creditor and the time and form of the specification filed. I shall not, however, pass upon these questions as it is apparent that the bankrupt is entitled…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Marshall Paper Co. v. TrainCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1900
  2. Teubert v. KesslerCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1924
  3. In re McCartyDistrict Court, N.D. Illinois · 1901

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. In Re SetzlerDistrict Court, S.D. California · 1947
  2. In Re LoweDistrict Court, W.D. Kentucky · 1941
  3. In re BranchDistrict Court, E.D. Tennessee · 1964
  4. First National Bank v. HaymesCivil Court of the City of New York · 1966
  5. In Re ScandiffioDistrict Court, E.D. New York · 1945

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API