In re Cohen
California Supreme Court
1Opinion of the CourtTerry, J.
Murray, C. J., concurred.
The return to the writ of habeas corpus shows, that Cohen and Jones are in custody under an attachment, issued out of the Fourth District Court, commanding the Sheriff to have said parties before said Court, to answer touching a certain contempt, which is alleged they had committed in refusing to obey a certain order of Court, (made in the case of Alvin Adams v. I. C. Woods and D. H. Haskell, pending in said Court, which order commanded Roman, Cohen, and Jones, to deliver to a Receiver, appointed by said Court, certain personal chattels therein specified, belonging to…
2Cited by22 opinions
- Havemeyer v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1890
- Robertson v. CommonwealthSupreme Court of Virginia · 1943
- Loaiza v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1890
- White v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1895
- Phillips v. WelchNevada Supreme Court · 1877
17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.