Commonwealth v. Heffelfinger
Superior Court of Pennsylvania
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion by
Henderson, J.,
The appellant first complains that the court erred in refusing to withdraw a juror as set forth in the first assignment, the occasion for such application being the remark of the court drawn out in a colloquy with the defendant’s counsel with reference to the significance of the term “criminal abortion,” a fnedical witness having used the phrase. Objection was made to the use of the word criminal whereupon that was stricken from the record, and in that connection the court said “I do not think it hurts you because there is not any other kind that could apply to this…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- Beardslee v. Columbia TownshipSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1898
- Commonwealth v. BradleySuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1901
- Commonwealth v. LongwellSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1922
3Cited by10 opinions
- Commonwealth v. MendolaSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1928
- Commonwealth Ex Rel. Ruger v. DaySuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1954
- Commonwealth v. SierakowskiSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1943
- United States v. KatzDistrict Court, M.D. Pennsylvania · 1948
- Commonwealth v. MartinSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1930
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.