Legal Opinion

In re Chopak

District Court, E.D. New York

Decided November 24, 1941No. 573PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

CAMPBELL, District Judge.

The above named attorney was presented for discipline on a number of charges. The testimony was taken before the Senior Judge, briefs were filed and the matter brought on for hearing before all of the judges of this court.

On the final hearing we informed Jules Chopak, the attorney, that the court would confine the hearing to the two, following charges: first, the charge that said Jules Qiopak improperly obtained from the libellant Ole Hansen the retainer of May 25th, 1940, agreeing to pay him one-half (50%) of any recovery or settlement in the suit of Ole Hansen…

2Cited by2 opinions

  1. In re ChopakDistrict Court, E.D. New York · 1946
  2. In re ChopakAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1960

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API