Legal Opinion
Jonke v. Rubin
Ohio Supreme Court
Decided November 4, 1959No. 35868Published
1Opinion of the CourtBell, J.
The plaintiffs, appellants herein, have posed three questions dealing primarily with the effect of the recording statute, Section 5301.25, Revised Code (Section 8543, General Code), on the situation here presented. Our view of the problem involved, however, limits our consideration to the question suggested by the defendant, as follows:
“Does the purchaser of real property at a county auditor’s tax forfeiture sale, who, prior to the trial of an action to quiet title to the property, has secured an auditor’s deed to the property in question, and has caused said deed to be duly recorded by the…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Kinney v. HoffmanOhio Supreme Court · 1949
- Bird v. StimsonMichigan Supreme Court · 1917
- Holly v. New York Central Rd.Ohio Court of Appeals · 1929
- Plumb v. RobinsonOhio Supreme Court · 1862
- Lewis v. AkerbergOhio Court of Appeals · 1954