Legal Opinion
Thompson v. Colorado
Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit
Decided August 7, 2001No. 99-1045PublishedCited by 32 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MURPHY, Circuit Judge.
I. INTRODUCTION
Plaintiffs-Appellees brought a class action suit against Defendant-Appellant State of Colorado (“Colorado”). Plaintiffs claimed that the fee charged by Colorado for handicapped parking placards violated the Americans with Disabilities Act of 1990 (“ADA”) and implementing regulations. After stipulating to various facts, both parties moved for summary judgment. In its motion for summary judgment, Colorado argued that Plaintiffs’ claims were barred by the Eleventh Amendment. The district court granted Plaintiffs’ motion for summary judgment and denied…
2Cases cited46 opinions
- Chevron U. S. A. Inc. v. Natural Resources Defense Council, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1984
- Steel Co. v. Citizens for a Better EnvironmentSupreme Court of the United States · 1998
- Faretta v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1975
- Ex Parte YoungSupreme Court of the United States · 1908
- City of Cleburne v. Cleburne Living Center, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1985
41 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by32 opinions
- Jaros v. Illinois Department of CorrectionsCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2012
- Ruiz v. McDonnellCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2002
- RUIZ v. McDONNELLCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2002
- United States v. KingCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 2004
- Kiman v. New Hampshire Department of CorrectionsCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 2002
27 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.