Legal Opinion
Thomas v. Crawford
Supreme Court of Georgia
Decided November 15, 1932No. 9243PublishedCited by 6 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtGilbert, J.
The evidence demanded the finding that the levy made under the tax fi. fa. was excessive, and for that reason it was void. Any sale under a void levy is itself void. For that reason the court did not err in directing a verdict for the plaintiff. Stark v. Cummings, 127 Ga. 107 (2) (56 S. E. 130); Williams v. Forman, 158 Ga. 89 (5), 90 (123 S. E. 20); Stowe v. Birmingham Trust & Savings Co., 161 Ga. 403 (131 S. E. 44); McDaniel v. Thomas, 162 Ga. 592 (133 S. E. 624); Davis v. Elliott, 163 Ga. 169 (2), 170 (135 S. E. 731). This is true notwithstanding the fact that fractional parts of the…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Stark v. CummingsSupreme Court of Georgia · 1906
- Williams v. FormanSupreme Court of Georgia · 1924
- McDaniel v. ThomasSupreme Court of Georgia · 1926
- Stowe v. Birmingham Trust & Savings Co.Supreme Court of Georgia · 1925
- Davis & Brandon v. ElliottSupreme Court of Georgia · 1926
3Cited by6 opinions
- Marietta Realty & Development Co. v. ReynoldsSupreme Court of Georgia · 1939
- Zugar v. ScarbroughSupreme Court of Georgia · 1938
- Long Realty Co. v. First National BankSupreme Court of Georgia · 1933
- Investors Finance Co. v. HillSupreme Court of Georgia · 1942
- Wood v. SommerfieldSupreme Court of Georgia · 1938
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.