Legal Opinion

Schenley Industries, Inc. v. Allen

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided April 28, 1966PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Order entered February 24, 1966, granting examination of respondents in order to frame a complaint, unanimously reversed, *743on the law and on the facts, with $30 costs and disbursements to respondents-appellants, the motion denied and the application dismissed. In order to obtain an examination to frame a complaint, plaintiff; should present facts fairly-indicating a cause of action against the adverse party. (Cotler v. Retail Credit Co., 18 A D 2d 898.) There is no such showing here.

Concur — -Rabin, J. P., McNally, Stevens and Eager, JJ.

2Cited by8 opinions

  1. In re SimpsonAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1978
  2. Newell v. MakhuliAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1975
  3. In re the Estate of ShubertNew York Surrogate's Court · 1981
  4. Tarter v. StateAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1986
  5. Banco de Concepcion v. Manfra, Tordella & Brooke, Inc.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1979

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API