Schenley Industries, Inc. v. Allen
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
1Opinion of the Court
Order entered February 24, 1966, granting examination of respondents in order to frame a complaint, unanimously reversed, *743on the law and on the facts, with $30 costs and disbursements to respondents-appellants, the motion denied and the application dismissed. In order to obtain an examination to frame a complaint, plaintiff; should present facts fairly-indicating a cause of action against the adverse party. (Cotler v. Retail Credit Co., 18 A D 2d 898.) There is no such showing here.
Concur — -Rabin, J. P., McNally, Stevens and Eager, JJ.
2Cited by8 opinions
- In re SimpsonAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1978
- Newell v. MakhuliAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1975
- In re the Estate of ShubertNew York Surrogate's Court · 1981
- Tarter v. StateAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1986
- Banco de Concepcion v. Manfra, Tordella & Brooke, Inc.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1979
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.