Legal Opinion

Olin v. Timken

Supreme Court of the United States

Decided November 19, 1894No. 36PublishedCited by 20 opinions

appeal from the circuit court of the united states for the SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF OHIO. This was a bill in equity, filed by Ilenry Timken in the Circuit Court of the United States for the Southern District of Ohio against Thomas D. Olin and Edwin D. Clin to restrain the infringement of three letters patent, namely, No. 197,6S9, granted to Henry Timken, November 27, 1877, for improvement in “carriage springs No. 239,850 to C. W. Saladee, April 5, 1881, for “road wagon;” reissue…

Read the full summary

appeal from the circuit court of the united states for the SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF OHIO. This was a bill in equity, filed by Ilenry Timken in the Circuit Court of the United States for the Southern District of Ohio against Thomas D. Olin and Edwin D. Clin to restrain the infringement of three letters patent, namely, No. 197,6S9, granted to Henry Timken, November 27, 1877, for improvement in “carriage springs No. 239,850 to C. W. Saladee, April 5, 1881, for “road wagon;” reissue patent No. 9542, granted January 25,1881, being a reissue of patent No. 157,430, to Tilton and Stivers for improvement…

1Opinion of the CourtChief Justice Fullee

Appellants manufactured no buggies or vehicles of any kind, but purchased and made springs which were fitted on wooden bars to be attached to the vehicles, and sold such spring bars in the market and to manufacturers of vehicles. The claims of the three patents, on which appellee’s suit was based, were to combinations relating to side-bar buggies and wagons, the side-bar gear and buggy body being elements of each combination. These patents are as follows:

1. No. 197,689, declared to be for “ improvement in carriage springs,” was granted to Henry Timken, November 27, 1877, upon application…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Duer v. Corbin Cabinet Lock Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1893
  2. Huber v. Nelson Manufacturing Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1893

3Cited by20 opinions

  1. National Hollow Brake-Beam Co. v. Interchangeable Brake-Beam Co.Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1901
  2. U. S. Industrial Chemicals, Inc. v. Carbide & Carbon Chemicals Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1942
  3. Werk v. ParkerSupreme Court of the United States · 1919
  4. Huebner-Toledo Breweries Co. v. Mathews Gravity Carrier Co.Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1918
  5. Cincinnati Traction Co. v. PopeCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1913

15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API