Legal Opinion

Rohr v. Crancer

Supreme Court of Kansas

Decided June 9, 1917No. 21,309Published

Appeal from Leavenworth district court; JAMES H. Wendorff, judge.

1Opinion of the Court

The opinion of the court was delivered by

Marshall, J.:

In this action the plaintiffs sought to enjoin the defendants from entering into a contract with E. L. Meek & Cbmpany to repave a street in the city «of Leavenworth. Judgment was rendered in favor of the defendants, and the plaintiffs appeal.

By stipulation of .the parties, G. C. Davis is substituted as appellee in the place of E. W. Crancer, as mayor of Leavenworth.

Under the plans and specifications prepared by the city for repaving this street, the contractor agreed that all imperfections, settlements, defects or damages to or in any part…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Miller v. BaierSupreme Court of Kansas · 1903
  2. La Veine v. City of Kansas CitySupreme Court of Kansas · 1903

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API