Legal Opinion

Giminski v. Irving

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided October 1, 1924PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Per curiam

The accident happened on May 5,1922, at about eleven p. m. The refusal of the trial court to charge that “ failure to have a light on the defendant’s car establishes a prima facie case of negligence ” was error. (Martin v. Herzog, 228 N. Y. 164.)

In the main charge the court said: “ The mere fact that there wasn’t any light on that motor vehicle does not necessarily make the defendant guilty of negligence, but it is an element to be taken *344into consideration as to whether or not he was guilty of negligence; it is only negligent provided that it was the proximate cause of the accident. If the…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Martin v. HerzogNew York Court of Appeals · 1920

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Bolivar v. MonnatAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1931
  2. Brown v. McCulloughAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1934
  3. Everett v. StateNew York Court of Claims · 1938
  4. Dougherty v. Pratt InstituteNew York Supreme Court · 1925
  5. Lewis v. RowlandAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1989

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API