Giminski v. Irving
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
1Per curiam
The accident happened on May 5,1922, at about eleven p. m. The refusal of the trial court to charge that “ failure to have a light on the defendant’s car establishes a prima facie case of negligence ” was error. (Martin v. Herzog, 228 N. Y. 164.)
In the main charge the court said: “ The mere fact that there wasn’t any light on that motor vehicle does not necessarily make the defendant guilty of negligence, but it is an element to be taken *344into consideration as to whether or not he was guilty of negligence; it is only negligent provided that it was the proximate cause of the accident. If the…
2Cases cited1 opinion
- Martin v. HerzogNew York Court of Appeals · 1920
3Cited by7 opinions
- Bolivar v. MonnatAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1931
- Brown v. McCulloughAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1934
- Everett v. StateNew York Court of Claims · 1938
- Dougherty v. Pratt InstituteNew York Supreme Court · 1925
- Lewis v. RowlandAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1989
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.